Math Autobiography Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Math Autobiography - Article Example The teacher did not grade our performances in such class activities but rather chose to mark a wrong or right, paying greater attention in determining our weaknesses which would then determine the solution approach adopted. Geometry particularly gave me problems initially. Specifically, I found it challenging to solve problems that required the determination of the length of the sides in triangles. There was a specific set of triangles that were standard in terms of the angles of the intersecting sides that was difficult to me. Problems related to equilateral triangles were simpler because of the equality in the measurements. However, problems regarding the other types, including scalene and isosceles triangles, were challenging to me. I would give significant attempts to solving questions regarding remote angles of a triangle but determining exterior angles were critically challenging. Moreover, there were problems that required complex shapes to be decomposed into simpler ones for their measurements to be determined. This posed the challenge of having to determine the appropriate shape and how to further determine the measurements. It was difficult to understand what made Geometry difficult to me. However, Holme argues that failure in findings solutions to problems could be attributed to fixed thoughts and inflexible approaches (6). The failure of familiar approaches to solve a problem could result in an experience of challenges. This could have been my problem because, even after learning the approaches to solving Geometry problems from my peers, I would still try to find how my approaches would fit in. I was afraid of adopting new strategies. However, I am now well versed with Geometry sums. I found the solution by starting with dropping all the methods I used to solve such problems. I then adopted new strategies as shown by my peer

Leadership Principles. Dilemma of today`s work organisations Essay

Leadership Principles. Dilemma of today`s work organisations - Essay Example This paper explains, discusses, and critically evaluates the above arguments of Warren Bennis. The next sections generally present the difference between management and leadership, and the concepts of ‘overmanaged and underled’, in contemporary work organisations. Leadership and Management Historians, academics, and researchers have frequently differentiated leadership and management. Management, to some, is a negative concept linked to all the weaknesses of a particular organisation. However, leading and managing are not independent concepts, nor is the differences between these two are definite. Yet, leaders and managers perform distinct tasks in an organisation. Managers supervise and maintain the status quo; leaders attempt to transform it. Moreover, organisations have distinct requirements for each of those functions at particular times and at specific levels in their evolution (Dessler 2000). Leaders are more expected to be visionary, creating measures to attain the vision, and motivating and empowering followers to be committed to that vision to surmount employee, bureaucratic, and technical obstacles, and accept change. Leaders are not risk-averse, particularly if they discern substantial returns from a plan (Hunt 1992). They eagerly wield power for control an d influence, attracting followers rather than using force to command obedience. Leaders dynamically pursue conflicting perspectives to distinguish alternatives to a plan. On the contrary, managers are more prone to prioritise resource allocation, supervising and organising other subordinates, evaluating outcomes against predetermined objectives, and pursuing the existing vision for the organisation. Managers work to bring order to the organisation and resolve issues while making certain of the dedication of others to the goals of the organisation (Rayner & Adam-Smith 2005). Managers are less willing to take risks compared to leaders. They exploit existing punishments and rewards, together with their understanding of group dynamics and individual motivation, to create expected attitudes and behaviour (Rayner & Adam-Smith 2005). Generally, according to Napier and Gershenfeld (1999), although numerous managers are leaders, and vice versa, managers are individuals who formulate plans an d create budgets, supervise employees by communicating procedures, and implement by evaluating outcomes against the objective. The senior leader, management, and administrative functions in organisations can espouse diverse conditions for leadership and management. Several tasks entail just management. Other tasks demand significant levels of leadership with modest requirement for management. Yet some require a combination of management and leadership. A prerequisite of